Show all data

• Metadata

  Kelly, Selsey. Kelly, S. E., ed., The Charters of Selsey, Anglo-Saxon Charters (Oxford, 1998), 6. 57 charters cited.

  • S 19. Comments, on links with South Saxon diplomatic., pp. xlvii-viii
  • S 42. Comments, authentic, date probably 717 or 724, no MS source for the name-form Braclæshamstede in earlier editions., pp. 36-7
  • S 43. Comments, forgery., pp. 26-9
  • S 44. Comments, authentic basis, perhaps several early records worked into a composite charter., pp. 31-5
  • S 45. Comments, fundamentally authentic although details of estates almost certainly altered, incarnation year probably acceptable, pp. 15-22
  • S 46. Comments, probably authentic., pp. 38-40
  • S 47. Comments, spurious, probably forged after transfer of see to Chichester in 1070s., pp. 40-1
  • S 48. Comments, probably authentic, date miscopied., pp. 42-3
  • S 49. Comments, probably fundamentally authentic, although dispositive section is defective and witness-list may have been tampered with., pp. 44-6
  • S 50. Comments, probably authentic basis, but vernacular bounds and details of swine-pastures a later interpolation, probable that part of dispositive section and the king's subscription have also been revised., pp. 105-6
  • S 53. Comments, on formulation., p. xlix
  • S 56. Comments, on formulation, p. xlix
  • S 106. Comments, on Gelling's identification; on script, pp. lxxxi n. 69, 49
  • S 108. Comments, on provenance, on witness-list; authentic basis, but bounds and list of gavel-land are certainly additions and perhaps also the reference to reversion, pp. xxx, lxxxi-iii, 109-10
  • S 123. Comments, on script, possible copy, p. 49
  • S 158. Comments, apparently authentic, pp. 61-5
  • S 230. Comments, spurious, pp. 101-3
  • S 232. Comments, spurious, no authentic information about early endowment, reference to Amberley is a late interpolation, pp. lxii-xv, 5-13
  • S 403. Comments, authentic basis but seems to have been partly rewritten to include fuller details of appurtenant woodland and meadow, pp. 74-7
  • S 425. Comments, more likely to refer to Durrington, Sussex, than to Darenth, Kent, p. 57
  • S 506. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 79-80
  • S 616. Comments, probably spurious but modelled on genuine diploma of 956, pp. 79-80
  • S 872. Comments, authentic, pp. 94-5
  • S 904. Comments, on Æthelingadene, p. 28
  • S 1172. Comments, probably authentic, should be treated as an addition to S 45, rather than as a separate document, pp. 15-22
  • S 1173. Comments, probably has an least an authentic basis, pp. 23-4
  • S 1178. Comments, probably authentic, date miscopied, pp. 56-8
  • S 1183. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 54-5
  • S 1184. Comments, MS 1 original, pp. 48-53
  • S 1206. Comments, based on authentic documentation but in its present form probably a combination of several records including a royal diploma of King Athelstan and at least one Old English document, pp. 66-70
  • S 1291. Comments, some authentic basis but details of transation may reflect later tampering and revisions, reference to Amberley a later interpolation, pp. lxix-lxxiii, 88-91
  • S 1435. Comments, authentic, pp. 61-5
  • S 42. Printed, no. 6
  • S 43. Printed, ex MSS 1, 2, no. 4
  • S 44. Printed, no. 5
  • S 45. Printed, no. 2
  • S 46. Printed, no. 7
  • S 47. Printed, no. 8
  • S 48. Printed, no. 9
  • S 49. Printed, no. 10
  • S 50. Printed, ex MS 2, pp. 103-5
  • S 108. Printed, pp. 107-9
  • S 158. Printed, no. 14
  • S 230. Printed, ex MS 1, pp. 99-101
  • S 232. Printed, ex MSS 1, 2, 3, 4, no. 1
  • S 403. Printed, no. 17
  • S 506. Printed, ex MSS 1, 2, no. 18
  • S 616. Printed, no. 19
  • S 872. Printed, no. 21
  • S 1172. Printed, no. 2
  • S 1173. Printed, no. 3
  • S 1178. Printed, no. 13
  • S 1183. Printed, no. 12
  • S 1184. Printed, no. 11
  • S 1206. Printed, no. 16
  • S 1291. Printed, no. 20
  • S 1435. Printed, no. 15